Ayn Rand's ideal man
Before Howard Roark, before Atlas Shrugged, before a generation of politicians handed the books to their staffers, Ayn Rand sketched her first hero. She based him on a man who kidnapped and dismembered a twelve-year-old.
That sentence is true, and it is also easy to abuse. So we are going to do the careful thing: grade exactly what Rand wrote, in her own journals, against the primary record — and mark just as clearly where the popular version overreaches. What she admired in a killer, what she explicitly did not, and how far you can honestly trace a line from a 1928 diary entry to a governing philosophy. The real quotes do not need to be exaggerated.
What this page is about
In 1928, a young Ayn Rand filled her journals with notes for an unfinished novel, The Little Street, whose hero — Danny Renahan — was her first attempt at drawing an ideal man. She modeled him, deliberately, on William Edward Hickman: a nineteen-year-old who had just kidnapped a twelve-year-old girl named Marian Parker from her Los Angeles school, murdered and dismembered her, and taunted her family with ransom notes. Rand called Hickman's credo — “What is good for me is right” — “the best and strongest expression of a real man's psychology I have heard,” and praised in her fictional stand-in a mind with “no organ for understanding… the necessity, meaning, or importance of other people.” This is from her own hand, page-cited in the published Journals of Ayn Rand and documented by mainstream historians.
And here is the part the viral version leaves out. Rand did not admire the murder — she recoiled from it, calling the real Hickman “a purposeless monster.” What gripped her was an abstraction she pulled away from the crime: a person wholly indifferent to what other people think, sovereign over “the mob.” She was, if anything, more interested in society's fury at Hickman than in Hickman. That distinction is the whole ballgame, and this page keeps it in view. The disturbing fact is not that Rand endorsed a killing; it is that when she reached for a picture of human greatness, the raw material she chose was a man defined by the absence of any feeling for others — and that the same ethic, cleaned up, became one of the most influential ideas on the American right.
The same investigation, restaged one beat at a time. Step through it here, or present it fullscreen.
Ayn Rand's Ideal Man
Before Howard Roark, before Atlas Shrugged, Rand sketched her first hero — and based him on a man who kidnapped and dismembered a twelve-year-old. The real quotes don't need to be exaggerated. Neither does the fence.
The record, claim by claim
Rand modeled her first sketch of an 'ideal man' on the psychology of a murderer, in her own journals.
FACTWriting around 1928, Ayn Rand quoted William Edward Hickman's credo — 'What is good for me is right' — and hailed it as above. She was then planning a novel, The Little Street, whose hero Danny Renahan was, in the words of Rand scholar Chris Sciabarra, deliberately modeled on Hickman as her first sketch of the ideal man. Of Renahan she wrote that he 'is born with a wonderful, free, light consciousness — [resulting from] the absolute lack of social instinct or herd feeling. He does not understand, because he has no organ for understanding, the necessity, meaning, or importance of other people.' The quotes are page-cited to the published Journals of Ayn Rand, and the modeling is documented by historian Jennifer Burns in Goddess of the Market (Oxford University Press).
“The best and strongest expression of a real man's psychology I have heard.”
- Journals of Ayn Rand, ed. David Harriman (Dutton, 1997), pp. ~21–27 — the Hickman and Renahan entries
- Jennifer Burns, Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right (Oxford University Press, 2009) — Rand modeled Renahan on Hickman
- Chris Matthew Sciabarra, Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical (Penn State University Press) — on Rand's early Nietzschean period
Who William Edward Hickman actually was: the kidnap, murder, and mutilation of 12-year-old Marian Parker.
FACTHickman was one of the most notorious criminals in America in 1928. In December 1927, aged nineteen, he took twelve-year-old Marian Parker from her Los Angeles school by lying that her father had been in an accident, then held her for a $1,500 ransom, taunting her family in notes signed variously 'Death,' 'Fate,' and 'The Fox.' He murdered and dismembered her, and delivered her body to her father at the ransom exchange. He was caught via fingerprints from a prior forgery conviction, confessed, and was executed in 1928. This is the man whose psychology Rand called the 'strongest expression of a real man's' she had encountered.
- Contemporaneous press coverage, Los Angeles, December 1927–1928 (the Marian Parker case; Hickman's ransom notes and confession)
- Crime histories of the Parker/Hickman case ('Fate, Death and the Fox'); Hickman executed at San Quentin, 1928
The fence, in her own words: Rand did NOT endorse the murder — she called Hickman 'a purposeless monster' and recast him as society's victim.
FACTThis is the passage the viral version omits, and it matters. In the same journals, Rand explicitly separated the archetype she wanted from the crime she deplored: she called the real Hickman 'a purposeless monster' and blamed society for producing him, fixating on what she saw as the mob's self-righteous fury more than on the killing itself. She was not celebrating a child's murder; she was abstracting a psychological trait — total independence from the opinion and needs of others — and prying it loose from the man who embodied it in its most monstrous form. We grade the admiration honestly precisely so this line stays visible.
“A brilliant, unusual, exceptional boy turned into a purposeless monster. By whom? By what? Is it not by that very society that is now yelling so virtuously in its role of innocent victim?”
- Journals of Ayn Rand (1997) — Rand's notes on the Hickman case, distinguishing the archetype from the crime and condemning the 'monster'
The trait she abstracted carried forward — into Howard Roark, and into the mature work.
FACTThe through-thread inside Rand's own writing is documented. Her early notes for The Fountainhead describe its hero Howard Roark in the terms above, and elsewhere she wrote, 'One puts oneself above all and crushes everything in one's way to get the best for oneself. Fine!' The core Rand admired in Hickman — the self as sovereign, the world as worthless, the herd as nothing — is the same core she built into the architect-hero who dynamites a housing project rather than compromise. This is a claim about the continuity of an idea across her notebooks, not a claim that Roark is Hickman. What persisted was the psychology of contempt for 'the mob,' refined into a virtue.
“[Howard Roark] has learned long ago, with his first consciousness, two things which dominate his entire attitude toward life: his own superiority and the utter worthlessness of the world.”
- Journals of Ayn Rand (1997), pp. ~78, 93 — early notes for The Fountainhead and Roark's 'superiority / worthlessness of the world'
- The Fountainhead (1943): Roark dynamites the Cortlandt housing project rather than see his design compromised — a bestseller, later a film
The line from that ethic to a governing philosophy is real as influence — but 'the Hickman admiration IS the philosophy' is a frame, not a proven chain.
SOME SMOKERand's influence on the American right is not in dispute: Alan Greenspan was a member of her inner circle before chairing the Federal Reserve; House Speaker Paul Ryan credited Atlas Shrugged as the reason he entered public life and reportedly had staffers read it (before distancing himself in 2012); her novels remain perennial sellers across the conservative movement, and her ethic of the heroic individual against a parasitic collective echoes through decades of anti-'welfare-state' politics. What we will NOT assert as fact is a clean causal chain — '1928 diary about a killer, therefore Reaganomics.' The admiration is documented; the philosophy's reach is documented; the claim that the one determines the other is an interpretive frame. We pose it as a question worth sitting with, not a verdict: what does it say that this ethic's earliest, purest expression was a mind that saw no reason other people should exist?
- Alan Greenspan's membership in Rand's 'Collective'; correspondence and public acknowledgment of her influence
- Paul Ryan on Atlas Shrugged (and his 2012 distancing); Rand's sustained sales and citation across the U.S. right
- See: 'The Trickle-Down Myth' — the policy outcomes of the ethic this page traces to its root
Where the evidence is strong, and where it stops
- This is her diary, not our inference. The load-bearing quotes come from the published Journals of Ayn Rand and are corroborated by a historian at a major university press. We are reading what she wrote, not psychoanalyzing her from a distance.
- She condemned the crime; say so plainly. The honest version is not “Rand loved a child-killer.” She called him a monster and blamed society for him. What she admired was an abstracted trait — indifference to others — which she deliberately separated from his acts. Leaving that out would be manufacturing an overreach to knock down, and we do not do that.
- “It was just her youth” is a fair objection — and an incomplete one. The Hickman entries date from her early twenties, in a Nietzschean phase her defenders say she outgrew. That is partly true. But the same nucleus — the hero's “superiority and the utter worthlessness of the world” — recurs in her notes for The Fountainhead fifteen years later and beyond. The trait was refined, not discarded.
- The politics is influence, not a syllogism. That Rand shaped the American right is documented through named figures. That her 1928 admiration of Hickman is that politics is a rhetorical move, and we grade it as one — a question posed, not a fact asserted. The strength of the page does not depend on that leap.
What we lionize, and what it's made of
The point is not to win an argument with a novelist who died in 1982. It sits alongside The Austerity Myth for a reason: those pages grade what the ideology does — that trickle-down failed every real test — while this one grades what it is made of. A philosophy that treats concern for other people as a weakness did not fall from the sky. Its founder went looking for a picture of the ideal human being and reached, at first, for a man whose defining feature was that other people did not register as real. She recoiled from what he did and kept the trait that let him do it. When a politics tells you that caring for the collective is the road to serfdom, it is worth knowing where that idea first found its hero — and being precise, because the unexaggerated version is the one that lasts.
Questions worth taking seriously
Isn't this just a smear? Rand didn't actually support murdering a child.
Correct — and we say so on the page, in her own words: she called the real Hickman “a purposeless monster.” The claim isn't that she endorsed the crime. It's the documented fact that when she drew her first “ideal man,” she modeled his psychology on a killer, admiring specifically his total indifference to other people — from her published journals, corroborated by a university-press historian. We correct the overreach precisely so the sourced part stands.
Wasn't this just a youthful, Nietzschean phase she grew out of?
Partly — and it's a fair objection. The Hickman notes are from her early twenties. But the same core she admired in him — the hero's “superiority and the utter worthlessness of the world” — shows up in her notes for The Fountainhead fifteen years later, and the ethic of the sovereign individual against the worthless collective is central to her mature, best-selling work. The raw expression was refined into a virtue, not abandoned.
Does Rand's influence on conservatism really run deep enough to matter?
Deep enough to be uncontroversial: Alan Greenspan was in her inner circle before running the Fed; Paul Ryan credited Atlas Shrugged for his career; her novels are perennial best-sellers and touchstones across the movement. What we don't claim is that the 1928 diary entry causes any of that. Influence is documented; the direct “Hickman-to-Reaganomics” line is a frame we pose, not a fact we assert.
If you are named on this page
If you are named on this page, or are a party materially affected by the claims made here, and you wish to respond, correct the record, or add context, use the Contact page. Responses are published verbatim alongside the original claim, with the sender identified and the date of receipt. The channel stays open for the life of the page.
This site aggregates and grades a record that other outlets and primary sources have already put on the record. Every FACT-graded claim above is sourced to court filings, government reports, sworn whistleblower disclosures, published investigative journalism, or named-source statements. The citations are the accountability mechanism; this section is how you get on the record too.
The record
- Journals of Ayn Rand, ed. David Harriman (Dutton, 1997) — the 1928 Hickman entries, the Renahan notes for The Little Street, the “purposeless monster” passage, and the early Fountainhead/Roark notes (pp. ~21–27, 78, 93)
- Jennifer Burns, Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right (Oxford University Press, 2009) — Rand modeled Renahan on Hickman; her early Nietzschean period and later influence
- Chris Matthew Sciabarra, Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical (Penn State University Press) — the deliberate modeling of Renahan on Hickman
- Contemporaneous press and crime histories of the Marian Parker case (Los Angeles, December 1927–1928): Hickman's kidnap, ransom notes, murder, confession, and 1928 execution
- On Rand's reach: Alan Greenspan's membership in Rand's “Collective”; Paul Ryan on Atlas Shrugged (and his 2012 distancing) — documented across the political record
- Black Book Audit — “The Trickle-Down Myth” (the outcomes of the ethic this page traces to its root)