THEBLACKBOOK AUDIT
Investigation · Looting the American Public

Blocked from selling it, they leased it — and cut the public's cut.

The same bill that couldn't force a sale of public land ordered the government to lease it for oil, gas and coal on a fixed schedule — and lowered the royalty the public earns on every barrel.

When Senator Mike Lee's mandate to sell public land was ruled out of order in June 2025, that was a real defeat. But the budget bill it was attached to — the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — still reshaped how the public's land is used. It repealed the higher royalty rate set in 2022, restoring the 12.5% rate, mandated quarterly onshore lease sales and dozens of offshore ones through 2040, and forced coal sales on every pending application. This page grades those provisions section by section.

§1 · Summary Brief

What this page is about

In the summer of 2025, one part of the budget bill tried to force the government to sell public land. That part was stripped out by the Senate parliamentarian and withdrawn. But the bill that became law — the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed July 4, 2025 — still contained a long list of provisions about how the public's land is leased for energy.

The law repealed the royalty-rate increase Congress had passed in 2022, putting the onshore oil-and-gas royalty back to 12.5% (from 16.67%). It ordered the Interior Department to hold onshore lease sales every quarter, mandated at least 30 offshore oil-and-gas lease sales outside Alaska through 2040, required coal lease sales on all pending applications, and lowered coal royalty rates. In short: it could not sell the land, so it required leasing it — and reduced the share the public keeps.

What we are NOT claiming
We are not claiming the 12.5% rate is a historic low or a secret giveaway. It is the rate the federal government charged for a century; the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act raised it to 16.67%, and this law restored the older number. The honest point is narrower and documented: the public now collects a smaller share than it briefly did, on a larger, mandated volume of leasing. We are also not claiming these leases are illegal — they are the law — only tracing who set the terms and who bears the cost.
Recommended reading

Books that go deeper on this story. Links are Amazon affiliate searches — buying through them supports the work at no cost to you.

▶ Dossier

The same investigation, restaged one beat at a time. Step through it here, or present it fullscreen.

Looting the American Public

Blocked from selling it, they leased it.

The same 2025 budget bill that couldn't force a sale of public land mandated leasing it for oil, gas and coal through 2040 — and cut the royalty the public collects back from 16.67% to 12.5%.

1 / 12▶ Present fullscreen
§2 · Sale blocked, lease mandated

The provision that failed, and the ones that passed

The land sale is the part that made headlines, because the public beat it. The leasing provisions in the same bill drew far less attention, and they are now law. This is what did and did not survive.

ProvisionWhat it didOutcome
The land sale (Lee)Mandated sale of over a million acres of BLM landDefeated — Byrd-ruled out, withdrawn June 28, 2025
Royalty cut (§50101, §50102, §50202)Repealed the 2022 rate increase; onshore oil/gas back to 12.5%; coal rates loweredEnacted
Onshore lease mandate (§50101)Quarterly lease sales; offer at least half of nominated parcels; all offered within 18 monthsEnacted
Offshore + Alaska mandate (§50102, §50104, §50105)≥30 offshore sales outside Alaska through 2040; 6 in Alaska; minimum sales in ANWR and the petroleum reserveEnacted
Coal + timber (§50201, §50301)Coal sales on all pending applications; minimum timber sales from national forests and BLMEnacted

Sources: Legal Planet section-by-section summary of the enacted law; congress.gov public-law text (Pub. L. 119-21); EY and API on the royalty rate change.

§3 · Graded Claims

The record, claim by claim

The law cut the onshore oil-and-gas royalty rate back to 12.5%, repealing the 16.67% rate set in 2022.

FACT

Section 50101(a) of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act repeals Section 50262 of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which had raised the minimum royalty on new federal onshore oil-and-gas leases to 16.67%. The rate returns to the historic 12.5% (one-eighth). The same section restores the minimum rent to $1.50 per acre and the minimum bid to $3 per acre. The royalty is the share of production value the public collects from drilling on its land, so a lower rate means a smaller public take on the same barrel.

The law mandates quarterly onshore lease sales and forces the government to offer nominated parcels on a deadline.

FACT

Sections 50101(b), (c) and (d) require the Interior Department to resume and hold onshore oil-and-gas lease sales every quarter in states with expressions of interest; to offer at least half of the acreage industry nominates; and to offer all nominated parcels for leasing within 18 months of nomination. 'Nomination' is the process by which companies point to the federal land they want opened. The effect is to remove the executive branch's discretion to decline or delay leasing that a prior administration had used to slow it.

The law mandates dozens of offshore lease sales through 2040 and reopens the Arctic refuge and petroleum reserve.

FACT

Section 50102(a) requires at least 30 offshore oil-and-gas lease sales outside Alaska through 2040 and 6 in Alaska's Cook Inlet through 2032; the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management describes this as a mandate to hold 36 offshore sales in the Gulf and Cook Inlet through 2040. Sections 50104 and 50105 require minimum lease sales in the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. Section 50102(d) also repeals the offshore royalty-rate increase from 2022. These are floors written into law, not discretionary plans.

The law forces coal lease sales on every pending application and lowers coal royalty rates.

FACT

Section 50201 requires the government to hold coal lease sales for all pending applications, and Section 50202 reduces the royalty rate charged on federal coal leasing. As with oil and gas, the pattern is a mandate to lease combined with a smaller public share on what is produced. The law also (Section 50301) sets minimum timber-sale volumes from the national forests and BLM lands.

The agencies have begun writing the rules to carry the cuts out.

FACT

The law is not aspirational; implementation is underway. On April 29, 2026 the Interior Department issued a direct final rule revising royalty regulations to effectuate the OBBBA changes, and on June 24, 2026 the Bureau of Land Management proposed a comprehensive revision of its onshore oil-and-gas leasing rules to reduce royalties and costs 'to implement requirements of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' These are the primary Federal Register documents turning the statute into operating policy.

§4 · Record vs Narrative

Where the evidence is strong, and where it stops

  • The rates and mandates are in the statute. Every figure here comes from the public law and the agencies' own implementing rules, not from an advocacy estimate. The royalty went to 12.5%, the lease sales are required, the coal and timber minimums are written down.
  • 12.5% is a restoration, not a new low. The one-eighth royalty was the standard federal rate for about a century. The 2022 climate law raised it to 16.67%; this law put it back. The honest claim is that the public collects less than it briefly did — and less than many states and private landowners charge for the same drilling — not that the rate is unprecedented.
  • The through-line is discretion removed. What ties the provisions together is that they convert leasing from something an administration may do into something it must do, on a schedule, with deadlines. That is a real shift in who controls the public's land, and it is documented.
  • The dollar cost to the public is not yet totaled. How much the lower royalty and larger leasing volume will cost the Treasury over the life of these leases is a modeling question we have not run, and we do not put a single headline number on it here.
§5 · Why It Matters

The quiet half of the same fight

The land sale was loud, and the public won it. The leasing terms were quiet, and they are law. That is the pattern worth watching: the fight everyone sees is not always the one that changes the most ground. The monument cuts removed the protections that had kept land off-limits to drilling and mining; this law set the terms on which that newly available land gets leased, and trimmed what the public earns when it is. Together they are two halves of the same story the Looting the American Public hub tracks: a shared inheritance opened up, and the public's share of it quietly reduced.

§6 · Questions

Questions worth taking seriously

Isn't 12.5% just the normal royalty rate?

Yes — that's the honest context. One-eighth was the federal rate for about a century. The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act raised it to 16.67%, and this law repealed that increase. The point is not that 12.5% is a secret low; it's that the public now collects less than it briefly did, and less than many states and private owners charge, on a larger, legally mandated volume of leasing.

Is leasing the same as selling the land?

No. A lease lets a company extract oil, gas, or coal for a term and pay royalties; the land stays federal. That's exactly why this matters as the companion to the sale fight: the land wasn't sold, but the bill still locked in how it gets used and what the public earns. We keep “leased,” not “sold,” on purpose.

Does the mandate really remove the government's choice?

Largely, for the covered categories. The law requires quarterly onshore sales, sets a floor of offshore sales through 2040, and forces coal sales on pending applications, with deadlines for offering nominated parcels. A future administration keeps some discretion at the edges, but the core decision to lease is now a statutory requirement, not a policy choice.

§7 · Standing Invitation

If you are named on this page

If you are named on this page, or are a party materially affected by the claims made here, and you wish to respond, correct the record, or add context, use the Contact page. Responses are published verbatim alongside the original claim, with the sender identified and the date of receipt. The channel stays open for the life of the page.

This site aggregates and grades a record that other outlets and primary sources have already put on the record. Every FACT-graded claim above is sourced to court filings, government reports, sworn whistleblower disclosures, published investigative journalism, or named-source statements. The citations are the accountability mechanism; this section is how you get on the record too.

§8 · Sources

The record

▦ Ledger gaps

Help us fill these lines.

This entry is graded on what’s on the public record. These are the blanks we know about. If you can source one, you’re rebuilding the ledger with us.

  • OpenHow much the lower royalty and larger mandated leasing volume will cost the Treasury over the life of the leases.Help fill this →
  • OpenWhich companies win the mandated sales, and how concentrated the winning bids turn out to be.Help fill this →
  • OpenWhether a future Congress or administration revisits the rate or the mandates.Help fill this →

Notify me when a gap is filled

We'll email you when we fill one of the gaps above.

By signing up you agree to receive emails from The Black Book Audit. Unsubscribe anytime.