The coup ledger.
A viral reel flashes 33 countries and dates under the caption “the United States sure does love a coup.” The real, graded count is far longer than 33 — and a handful of the reel's entries don't belong on it. Both of those facts matter.
This is the ledger done properly: anchored to the peer-reviewed dataset that counted them, graded by how solid the evidence is, and honest about the difference between a coup, an invasion, an election rigged from Washington, and a proxy war. The pattern is real and vast. The way to make it undeniable is to get every line of it right.
What this page is about
The viral list is directionally true and numerically timid. The single most authoritative account of American regime change is Lindsey O'Rourke's Covert Regime Change: America's Secret Cold War (Cornell University Press, 2018), built from the National Archives and presidential libraries. Her count for the Cold War alone (1947–1989): 72 US attempts at regime change — 64 covert and 6 overt. A separate peer-reviewed study (Dov Levin) found the US intervened in at least 81 foreign elections between 1946 and 2000. Neither figure includes the pre-1947 era the reel opens with — Hawaii, the Philippines, the banana-war occupations of Cuba, Nicaragua, Honduras, Haiti and the Dominican Republic — nor the post-Cold-War wars in Panama, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. So yes: the real list runs well past 33.
But a list that long only works as an argument if it is clean, and the reel isn't quite. It mixes genuine US-engineered overthrows (Iran 1953, Guatemala 1954, Chile 1973) with things that are not coups at all: South Korea 1945 was liberation-and-occupation after Japan's defeat, not a US coup; Afghanistan in the 1980s was an anti-Soviet proxy war (arming the mujahideen), not the toppling of a government the US then replaced; and Venezuela 2026 is an ongoing event, not settled history. Padding a true pattern with soft entries is exactly how a bad-faith critic gets to wave the whole thing away.
So we do both jobs at once. Below, we grade the ledger in tiers — the declassified, US-acknowledged coups that are beyond dispute; the overt regime-change wars done in broad daylight; the serial interventions of the banana-war decades; and the full scholarly count that dwarfs any montage — and we flag the reel's category errors by name. It lives in Crimes of Empire, next to our look at whether the same playbook has ever been pointed at home.
The same investigation, restaged one beat at a time. Step through it here, or present it fullscreen.
The Coup Ledger.
A viral reel flashes 33 countries under 'the US sure does love a coup.' The real, graded count is far longer — and a few of its entries don't belong. Both facts matter.
The ledger, in tiers of certainty
The real count dwarfs the reel: 72 Cold-War regime-change attempts, plus 81 election interventions — before you count the bookends.
FACTThe scale is not an activist estimate; it is a peer-reviewed dataset. Political scientist Lindsey O'Rourke (Boston College), drawing on archival research at the National Archives and presidential libraries, documented 72 US regime-change attempts during the Cold War (1947–1989): 64 covert and 6 overt — the US was about ten times more likely to try to topple a government secretly than openly. Separately, political scientist Dov Levin found the US intervened in at least 81 foreign national elections between 1946 and 2000. Those windows exclude the pre-1947 era entirely (Hawaii 1893 onward) and the post-1991 wars (Panama, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya). The reel's 33 is a fraction of the documented whole.
The declassified spine: coups the US government itself now acknowledges.
FACTThese are the cases where there is no longer any serious debate, because the United States' own records confirm them. Iran 1953: the CIA and MI6 organized Operation Ajax to overthrow Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh after he nationalized Anglo-Iranian oil; the CIA formally acknowledged its role in documents declassified in 2013. Guatemala 1954: Operation PBSuccess removed the elected Jacobo Árbenz, who had moved to expropriate United Fruit Company land; the CIA's own histories are declassified. Chile 1973: Church Committee findings and declassified files document years of US covert action against Salvador Allende before his overthrow. Congo 1960–61: the Church Committee documented CIA plots against Patrice Lumumba. Brazil 1964 (Operation Brother Sam), Indonesia 1965 (US embassy cables and 'kill lists' passed to the army), and the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba round out a spine that rests on the government's own paper.
The overt tier: regime change done in daylight — Hawaii, the Dominican Republic, Panama, Iraq, Libya.
FACTNot every US overthrow was secret. Some were acts of open war or occupation, and the record is on the surface. Hawaii 1893: American settlers, backed by US Marines landed from the USS Boston, overthrew Queen Liliʻuokalani; a century later Congress passed the 1993 Apology Resolution admitting the US role in the illegal overthrow. Dominican Republic 1965: President Johnson sent some 22,000 troops to block a leftist restoration. Panama 1989: the US invaded to remove Manuel Noriega. Iraq 2003: the US invaded and removed Saddam Hussein on since-discredited WMD claims. Libya 2011: a US-backed NATO air campaign enabled the overthrow and killing of Muammar Gaddafi. These are regime changes the US does not deny — only defends.
The banana-war decades: before 1947, the US installed and removed Caribbean and Central American governments at will.
FACTThe reel's early dates point at a real and often-forgotten era. Between the 1898 Spanish–American War and the 1934 Good Neighbor Policy — the 'Banana Wars' — the US Marines repeatedly invaded and occupied Cuba, Nicaragua, Honduras, Haiti, the Dominican Republic, and Mexico (the 1914 occupation of Veracruz), protecting corporate interests like the United Fruit Company and installing or propping up compliant governments. Cuba was occupied twice and bound by the Platt Amendment, which gave Washington a standing right to intervene. Nicaragua was occupied almost continuously from 1912 to 1933. Haiti was occupied 1915–1934. This is the foundation the Cold War operations were built on: a settled habit of treating the hemisphere as a backyard to be managed.
The contested tier: cases where US involvement is alleged or partial, not fully documented — graded down accordingly.
SOME SMOKEHonesty about a long list means marking the entries that are thinner. For some of the 72, the US role is documented as support, encouragement, or foreknowledge rather than authorship — a coup the CIA welcomed and may have greased, but did not necessarily run. Argentina's 1976 junta, for instance, is firmly tied to US support through the Operation Condor files (Washington backed and coordinated with the Southern Cone dictatorships), but the coup itself was executed by Argentine officers; the honest grade for 'the US staged it' is softer than for Guatemala. Syria (1949 and again 1956–57), Ecuador, Bolivia, Ghana 1966, and others sit on a spectrum from well-documented to plausibly-alleged. We grade these SOME SMOKE where the evidence shows a US thumb on the scale but stops short of US authorship — and we say which is which rather than flatten them all to 'the US did it.'
The reel's errors: South Korea 1945 and Afghanistan 1980s aren't coups, and Venezuela 2026 hasn't finished happening.
FALSE / MISLEADINGThree entries in the montage don't belong in a coup ledger, and leaving them unchallenged would discredit the rest. South Korea 1945 was not a US coup: it was the US military occupation of the southern half of the peninsula after Japan's WWII surrender, which later hardened into a separate state — an occupation and a Cold War division, not the overthrow of a government the US then replaced. Afghanistan in the 1980s was Operation Cyclone, the CIA's arming of the mujahideen against the Soviet occupation — a proxy war, not a US-engineered coup; the US did not install the government that followed (it was a civil war and eventually the Taliban). Venezuela 2026 refers to ongoing US pressure and military action against the Maduro government; whatever it becomes, it is a live event, not a closed case of regime change, and listing it as a completed coup is getting ahead of the facts. We grade these as the reel's miscategorizations — and keeping the ledger clean of them is what makes the real entries unanswerable.
The honest fence: a coup is not an invasion is not election-meddling is not a proxy war — and the ~400-intervention figure is a different thing.
FACTThe strongest version of this story depends on precision about categories. 'Regime change' (replacing a government) is distinct from a 'coup' (an illegal seizure of power, often by a country's own military with outside help), from an 'election intervention' (funding or rigging a vote, as in Italy 1948 or the ~81 cases Levin counts), and from a 'proxy war' (arming someone else's fighters). The widely shared claim of 'nearly 400 US military interventions' is real but refers to the Congressional Research Service's tally of all armed deployments abroad — most of which are evacuations, shows of force, or raids, not regime changes. We keep these buckets separate on purpose: the regime-change record alone is damning enough that it does not need to borrow from the others, and borrowing from them is what lets critics change the subject.
From the Monroe Doctrine to the second Trump term
The through-line is older than the CIA. The 1823 Monroe Doctrine declared the hemisphere off-limits to European powers, and by the time Secretary of State William Seward called it “an irreversible fact” in 1867, the US had begun treating the governments to its south as things it was entitled to arrange. Hawaii in 1893 and the Philippines after 1898 extended the habit across the Pacific. The Banana Wars made it routine. What the Cold War added was not the impulse but the machinery: a permanent intelligence service, after 1947, that could do quietly and repeatedly what the Marines had done loudly — and a doctrine, anti-communism, that could justify toppling almost any government that nationalized an industry or won an election the US disliked. Mossadegh nationalized oil; Árbenz touched United Fruit's land; Allende was an elected Marxist. The rationale was security; the pattern was control.
O'Rourke's central finding is the one that should unsettle even people who assume they know this history: the US tried covert regime change roughly ten times for every overt one. The coups we remember — Iran, Guatemala, Chile — are the few that leaked, were investigated, or were finally declassified. For every one of those, there were several more that never became famous, which is precisely why a viral reel can list 33 and still be undercounting by a wide margin. Secrecy was not incidental; it was the preferred method, chosen because covert action let presidents act without Congress, allies, or voters weighing in.
And the ledger is not closed. The same instinct is visible in the 2020s: the economic and military pressure campaigns of the second Trump administration, the moves against the Maduro government in Venezuela, the designs on Greenland we trace in Sovereignty for Sale. Whether those become the next entries on this page is being decided now. That is the reason to keep the ledger accurate rather than cathartic: it is not a museum of old sins, it is a running tally, and the people adding to it are counting on the public losing track.
The pattern is the point — and so is getting it right
A single coup can be explained away as a Cold War necessity, a one-off, a mistake by one administration. Seventy-two cannot. The value of the ledger is that it converts a string of individually-defensible episodes into a visible policy: for most of a century, when a foreign government did something the United States did not want — nationalized an industry, leaned left, won the wrong election — one of the tools on the table was replacing it, usually in secret. That is not a conspiracy theory; it is the documented operating behavior of a superpower, and it is the context every current confrontation should be read against. It is also why the aftermaths matter: the 1953 Iran coup helped produce the 1979 revolution; arming the mujahideen helped seed what came after; the Iraq War destabilized a region for a generation. The ledger is not just a record of what was done, but of what it cost, mostly to people who never got a vote in Washington.
- If a peer-reviewed dataset counts 72 regime-change attempts in just the Cold War, why is the public memory stuck at the famous handful — and who benefits from a citizenry that thinks Iran and Guatemala were exceptions rather than the method?
- The US chose covert regime change ten times as often as overt. What does it mean for a democracy that its most consequential foreign actions were, by design, the ones its own voters and Congress were not allowed to see or stop?
- Each coup was sold as a response to an emergency. Looking at the whole ledger, which was truly about security — and which was about oil, land, United Fruit, or simply a government that wouldn't take orders? And how would you tell the difference in the one happening right now?
Questions worth taking seriously
Isn't a list like this just anti-American propaganda?
The opposite — it's built almost entirely from American sources: the CIA's own declassified histories, the US Senate's Church Committee, Public Law 103-150 in which Congress apologized for Hawaii, and a peer-reviewed dataset by a US political scientist. Documenting what a government did, using that government's own records, is accountability, not propaganda. The propaganda move is the reverse: insisting a superpower with a declassified record of dozens of coups has clean hands. We also correct the exaggerations (the reel's non-coups, the inflated intervention counts) precisely because an honest ledger is more powerful than an angry one.
Weren't a lot of these justified by the Cold War against the Soviets?
Some were genuinely contested calls against a real adversary — we don't pretend the USSR was benign or that every target was a democrat. But two things survive that defense. First, the targets were often elected or nationalist, not Soviet puppets: Mossadegh, Árbenz, Allende, Lumumba were not Moscow's men, and treating anyone who nationalized oil or won a left-wing election as a Soviet asset is how the “necessity” expanded to cover almost anything. Second, the method — doing it covertly, around Congress and the public — is a democracy problem regardless of the target. “We had a good reason” and “we hid it from our own people and left wreckage behind” can both be true, and the ledger holds both.
If you are named on this page
If you are named on this page, or are a party materially affected by the claims made here, and you wish to respond, correct the record, or add context, use the Contact page. Responses are published verbatim alongside the original claim, with the sender identified and the date of receipt. The channel stays open for the life of the page.
This site aggregates and grades a record that other outlets and primary sources have already put on the record. Every FACT-graded claim above is sourced to court filings, government reports, sworn whistleblower disclosures, published investigative journalism, or named-source statements. The citations are the accountability mechanism; this section is how you get on the record too.
The record
- Lindsey A. O'Rourke — Covert Regime Change: America's Secret Cold War (Cornell University Press, 2018); 64 covert + 6 overt attempts, 1947–1989
- Wikipedia — United States involvement in regime change (comprehensive, cited chronology 1893–2026)
- National Security Archive — the CIA's 2013 admission of its role in the 1953 Iran coup (Operation Ajax)
- U.S. Senate 'Church Committee' — Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders (1975)
- National Security Archive — the Operation Condor files
- U.S. Public Law 103-150 (1993) — the 'Apology Resolution' on the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii
- Wikipedia — Operation Cyclone (CIA support for the Afghan mujahideen; a proxy war, not a coup)
- Congressional Research Service — Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad
- Black Book Audit — To Coup or Not to Coup (the playbook pointed at home)
- Black Book Audit — Crimes of Empire