Dossier mode
The $25 Million Fee
The same investigation, restaged one beat at a time. Drive it with the arrow keys, space, or autoplay. Nothing is cut from the piece — long runs are split across frames. Read the full investigation or open the The Epstein Class hub.
The $25 Million Fee
What a Swiss Bank Paid Jeffrey Epstein the Same Month It Settled with DOJ
Edmond de Rothschild's Swiss bank paid Jeffrey Epstein $25 million through a shell company on a sliding scale written directly against its own Justice Department penalty — an outcome-linked fee for services no public record can account for.
We are documenting the contract and the timing, not what Epstein delivered: the work is described only as 'risk analysis and the application and use of certain algorithms,' and whether DOJ knew about the arrangement while negotiating the settlement is unresolved. Every figure here is grounded in the signed agreement and the emails released in 2026.
A fee written before the penalty, paid the month it landed.
What Southern Trust — Epstein's British Virgin Islands entity, with Epstein as president — was paid after the Rothschild settlement landed. Forbes reported a separate November 3, 2015 addendum folding 'estate planning' into a different fee structure, which is why its breakdown differs from the Herald's clean $25 million figure.
The October 5, 2015 Southern Trust contract set Epstein's fee as a direct function of the DOJ penalty: $25 million if the bank settled for under $75 million, $10 million if the penalty ran between $75 million and $150 million.
The fee was written as a sliding scale against the size of the government's punishment — the payout rose as the penalty fell. The contract language is quoted directly in the Miami Herald's account.
The bank's December 18, 2015 settlement came in at $45.245 million — under the $75 million line — triggering the contract's top tranche, and $25 million was paid to Epstein through Southern Trust.
The settlement figure that determined Epstein's fee is a matter of public DOJ record; the payment through Southern Trust is documented in the 2026 release. In December 2015 Ariane de Rothschild emailed Epstein '$45 mio?' and he replied with the breakdown — legal fees near $10 million, himself at $25 million.
Kathy Ruemmler — Obama's former White House Counsel — took the bank as a client in 2014 while in private practice, and a Justice Department document shows her affirming Epstein's consulting role for the bank in writing.
The former top White House lawyer represented the very bank whose settlement outcome fixed Epstein's fee, then, as Goldman Sachs' general counsel, stepped back after the 2026 release surfaced her Epstein correspondence. The written affirmation is reported but the underlying document is not fully public — graded as the page grades it.
What Epstein actually did to earn $25 million — described in his own contract only as 'risk analysis and the application and use of certain algorithms' — has no public documentation beyond that phrase.
There is a signed fee and a settlement it tracks, but no deliverable, work product, or evidence of services on the record. The vague professional-services language is the entire description of the work.
Whether the Justice Department knew about the Southern Trust arrangement while it negotiated the $45.245 million settlement in 2015 — or learned of it only through the 2026 document release — is unresolved.
The contract keyed a private $25 million payout to the exact outcome DOJ was negotiating. Nothing on the record establishes whether prosecutors were aware of that incentive at the table.
What the contract establishes, and what it does not.
- A signed October 2015 contract keying Epstein's fee to the size of the DOJ penalty — $25M under $75M, $10M above it.
- A $45.245M settlement that fell in the top tranche, and a $25M payment through his BVI shell.
- A former White House Counsel representing the bank whose penalty set the fee.
- What 'risk analysis' or 'algorithms' Epstein actually delivered for the money.
- Whether DOJ knew about the outcome-linked fee while negotiating the settlement.
Why it matters now.
The Rothschild fee follows the shape of other Epstein 'consulting' arrangements across this hub: an outcome-linked payment to an Epstein shell, timed to a legal or regulatory event, described in professional-services language that explains nothing. Read together, the contracts stop looking like advisory work and start looking like a pricing structure.
Help us fill these lines.
- OpenWhat specific 'risk analysis' or algorithms did Epstein's Southern Trust actually deliver to Edmond de Rothschild's bank to earn the $25 million fee?
- OpenDid the Justice Department know about the Southern Trust fee arrangement while negotiating the $45.245 million settlement in 2015, or did it learn of it only through the 2026 document release?